If this option is offered to you, you may not be able to distinguish between the middle, left and right wing in your fantasy league. Grouping all attackers in one position is the default option for ESPN leagues and is the best way to play. There, I said it.
What for? The line got too blurry. Many players go to baseball, but they don’t play in the middle. Many pianos traditionally play a central role on the ice. Many teams use a strategy in which players are placed in different positions. Some lines have two centres and decide depending on the situation who will play the role.
But the biggest problem is that the acceptance of positions is an imperfect system when it comes to fantasy hockey. There are no clear rules for roles, and positions can change. It is certainly a much bigger problem when it comes to the left wing and the right wing, and I see the argument for a league that separates the centers and the wings. But in general, the best way to tackle the problem is to eliminate it.
Because when it comes to getting out of the situation, it’s not that different.
Let’s take an example of all the progressive players who scored at least 40 points last season and see if we can draw any conclusions. There are 118 players who have spent 40 points. The average value of their total confrontation is 437, so we will use this value as a threshold to divide the actors into two groups. There are 48 people who have more faces than average and 70 people who have fewer faces.
ESPN is played by more people than anywhere else. Join or compete in the #1 game of Fantasy Hockey and play as you like with customizable results and settings.
Create a competition today or join a competition >>
The overall average statistics for players with a large number of opponents is 23 goals, 35 assists and 58 points. The combined average of the statistics of 70 players who are less likely to face each other is 23 goals, 31 assists and 54 points. The other one? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. But different enough not to be considered marginal? Four tools certainly seem marginal.
We will now center the same 118 players in the ESPN leagues. Of this group 67 could stand in the middle and 51 could not. The average score of the eligible centres is 22 goals, 35 assists and 58 points (these figures are rounded up, so they don’t add up exactly, I know). This is very similar to the Face Leader in the example above. This time however, the average performance of the group on the wing alone is 23 goals, 29 assists and 52 points. That’s six gears down, but one more target. Maybe it’s more than a coincidence… …but not much.
It’s an important memory: The system of recording in every fantasy league is flawed. This group of adapted centres consists of Patrick Kane, Philip Forsberg and Artemie Panarin, who won three personal competitions last season. Shit, Panarin hit 23 headballs in his career.
The factor of a person’s suitability for a particular job creates a different playing field for each significant difference we can identify by splitting the statistics.
What have we learned here? Are there enough differences to believe that something can be achieved by twisting the centres against the wings? I think the general lesson is that an attacker is an attacker if you only look at the players from the statistical basis to broad categories.
Where we start to see some separation is when you pass goals, points and special teams. There is a significant shift to wings for strikes and a significant shift to midfield for blocked shots, although blocked shots are more of a bonus because most attackers get very little of them. But mixing these categories in your fantasy team requires a touch of skill, because it’s rarely the right thing to do to connect Ryan Reeves and his 316 moves to your list and complete it. Even the separation of centres and wings should not be a big part of your design plans for the day.
If you can’t change your competition settings, you have to take pictures. This may mean that some players are pulled into the middle slot, while others are pulled into their flank position.
For the above reasons, you don’t have to think about it. An attacker is an attacker, and if your league doesn’t use kick-off as a credit category, you can use the same group of attackers, regardless of the lineup requirements.
There are enough places among the top players in the league to determine the statistics and skills, with the placement requirements only for the last few kilos being taken into account. Don’t think too much about a player’s position if he doesn’t fit in your line-up. Look at the production as a whole and think about the possibilities for a job when you start filling the list.
My point is that the centers on the depth chart are less mobile than the wings. It is easy – especially since there are twice as many on the line or in a team – to move the wings on a depth map to create a spark. Few teams have a third center that deserves to be established.
In light of this, it may be better to exhaust the centers a little earlier than the wings, as the centers will appear less quickly in the middle of the season. It is safe to say that apart from the injuries, we now know that the No. 1 and No. 2 centers that will retain that role for 23 of the 31 NHL teams this season. It is likely that the other eight teams will be blocked at the beginning of the season.
For such an order only in competitions that share positions, I think it would be wise to concentrate a little on blocking some good centers from the beginning. But I don’t think she’s breaking the deal. You have to keep that in mind, especially when you know that your liguemates don’t trade much. Most quality centres will be on a list to be included in the project.
High-end types I like.
Jack Eichel, C, Buffalo Sabres (8th place in the ESPN ranking) :
Do we have more to say here than just Taylor Hall? Eichel is an ice player and so far he has managed to save himself. The chamber gives acorns both in the power balance and, perhaps more importantly, in the power grab game, assets ready for the MVP. Last season Eichel was good with 27 points in the standings, but his promotion to this division places him in the top five fantasy players in the overall standings. With Hall, Acorn and Rasmus Dalin in the lead on the men’s side, the Sabres have to climb from 20th place in the league to turn power into a race.
Did you miss an episode of the ESPN On Ice podcast with Greg Vishynski and Emily Kaplan? Here you will find all episodes of the catalogue of the series. Listen, listen, listen.
Blake Wheeler, RW/C, Winnipeg Jets (26th on the ESPN list) :
Wheeler was largely ousted last season by Mark Scheifele because of Brian Little’s injury, and this year he has to return to the wing thanks to Paul Stastney’s return to Winnipeg. That role earned him 91 points for last season. Although he is not a 34-year-old NHL spring chicken, he is the type of physical player who needs to remain virtually elitist for a season or two. I tend to be closer to the top 15 rolls than to the top 25.
Midier are the guys I like.
Mark Scheiffele, C, Winnipeg Jets and Taylor Hall, C/LW, Buffalo Sabres (#40 and #42 in ESPN Rankings) :
It’s an extension of my sympathy for the acorn and the shovel. Of course, I also expect their criminal partners to do better than expected.
Anze Copitar, C, Kings of Los Angeles (54th place in the ESPN ranking) :
I don’t have much knowledge of coparate games here, except to say that with a little fresh blood and a regular coach, the Kings will be the best team this season. Add to that the fact that Copitar was in the top 40 fantasy players last season and I see no reason to take him out of the top 50. She and Dustin Brown have a common rhythm, and Alex Jafallo completes the duo. Only the other two lines provoked new shooting attempts on (Corsie) last season. Although the only fresh blood during the season will be Gabriel Villardi (and not Alex Turcott or Arthur Kaliyev), the second royal notes will be improved and the pressure will be reduced.
Adam Enrique, C, Anaheim Dax (88th place in the ESPN ranking) :
Despite the fact that we played this role last season, this will be the first campaign in which Enrique enters with a central cemented number one role. Last season Ryan Getzlaf was ahead of him in the general classification, but this season Enrique should take the lead. Jakob Silfwerberg and Rikard Raquell have created the perfect line and the trio should play together under the improved lines in their second season.
I will live and die until.
Cody Glass, C, Vegas Golden Knights (unclassified) :
The Golden Knights have their original dynamic trio in the form of William Carlsson, Jonathan Marchesso and Reilly Smith. Paul Stastny’s departure in this off-season gives Glass the perfect opportunity to shift the depth map as a new center for Max Pacioretty and Mark Stone, two dynamic wings who like to bring the puck to (and into) the grid. Glass has been on the sidelines of the NHL for several seasons now, so it’s easy to think he’s a bit older, but he’s still only 21 and is waiting for his first real chance. This should be the season when he gets the chance to show his chops in the middle. (Sorry, I know the depth map will be different, but I still think the line where Pacioretty and Stone are gonna be number one here)
Rear emergency selection that can activate.
Joel Ericsson Ek, C, Minnesota Wild (unclassified) :
Last season’s number 1 and number 2 wilderness centres have been removed, and the new versions are not number 1 means of the central pedigree. Can Marcus Johansson do the travelling work? Of course, he used to fill his glasses and did well. But transnational capabilities are not what the team is looking for. Is Nick Bonino suitable for this role? No, not really. He’s moved to one of the best number 3 centers. Does Ericsson Eck have a chance to become center number one? He can. He was certainly touched, as in his promising days. This is particularly exciting given the long-awaited arrival of superstar Kirill Kaprizov Avenue, which has the potential to become a rotorcraft from the outset.
The dangers I avoid with every project this season.
J.T. Miller, C, Vancouver Canucks (22nd in the ESPN ranking) :
I like that Miller has blossomed at the top of Kanax with more responsibility, but I don’t think I’m ready to put him in the top 25 after one season. Elias Pettersson makes his fellow miners special, and Miller takes the place of Pettersson and Brock Booser. But for Miller, just like last season, everything went perfect, and if you get him in the top 25, you can expect another season of perfection. There are names behind him that I would add to my team before I thought of Miller. He’s not an idiot at all, but I wouldn’t want him on one of my top teams.